The search for ways and methods of emasculating men has reached into the world of psychology and psychiatry and has; once again, found another buzz-word “TOXIC masculinity” that is being pimped and promoted by the Leftist elite, and picked up by their hordes of minions, who have set out to shove it down our collective throats, as they do with everything on the Leftist agenda.
The Left demands people always lead with their feelings and emotions, rather than through logic, fact, and rationale. The Left can not afford to allow what has worked for thousands of years to continue.
How does the Left define traditional/toxic masculinity? As with/in many Leftist societal control mechanisms, you can find 10,000 definitions if you ask 1,000 experts, who all disagree with one another.
One article I found (HERE) was written by Colleen Clemens, who is an associate professor of non-Western literatures and director of Women’s and Gender Studies at Kutztown University in Pennsylvania.
As with all articles I’ve managed to find on this FAIRLY-NEW subject, Colleen fails to define toxic masculinity beyond vague generalizations and assumptions that fit both male and female. One such paragraph taken from this article”
Toxic masculinity is a narrow and repressive description of manhood, designating manhood as defined by violence, sex, status and aggression. It’s the cultural ideal of manliness, where strength is everything while emotions are a weakness; where sex and brutality are yardsticks by which men are measured, while supposedly “feminine” traits—which can range from emotional vulnerability to simply not being hypersexual—are the means by which your status as “man” can be taken away“
Pardon my bluntness, but males are not the only sect of humans who engage in violence, have sex, compete over status, or engage in aggressive measures. One merely needs to binge-watch tv/internet series such as the “Real Housewives” series on the Bravo channel, watch the backstage drama behind events such as the Mrs. Universe, Miss America, etc… competitions.
Are males the only human species that are hypersexual? Why is nymphomania almost exclusively attributed to the female of the human species?
This previous quote also notes “sex and brutality are yardsticks by which men are measured”, yet this statement is selectively sexist and self-satisfying.
In the end, I have to ask why a WOMAN is writing about supposed MALE attributes and actions? Should I (A biological male) now endeavor to go write a series of books on pregnancy and other FEMALE issues?
The Left is the party of slavery and has been since the first man learned how to enslave another.
The 21st-Century Left wishes to present itself as the Anti-Slavery party, but what if you could pretend to be against slavery, while still supporting many of the facets of slavery over all humanity, without calling it slavery?
Slaves are considered toxic and inferior, due to their race, ethnicity, nationality, etc…
Black slaves were taught that they were toxic and inferior, due to their race, ethnicity, nationality, etc…
Slaves have this idea beaten into them for so long, they accept their “toxic and inferior” status and are submissive to their owners/masters.
But what if man could retain this control over people, based upon things other than their race, ethnicity, and/or nationality?
It seems to be en-vogue that those of the White race are now toxic and inferior, but this isn’t supposed to be viewed as racism.
The Left has long attacked traditional femininity through defiminization, but they mask it under the guise of liberalism, empowerment, women’s, and/or equal rights.
They’ve now upped the ante and added this charge to “traditional /toxic masculinity”.
Emasculated men are easier to control and enslave, and that’s all this really boils down to.
Can you spare $1 or $2 to help keep this website going?