My Fellow Americans

I’ve grown completely weary of watching freedom loving Patriots, yield incessantly for fear of hurting somebody’s feelings, emotions, or their psyche, and their giving in to public pressure from the even larger screaming voices of the pathetic Left, or even fear of reprisals from the same.

To be perfectly honest, I think it’s time to kick some ass.

“Fellow” as a noun – a person in the same position, involved in the same activity, or otherwise associated with another.

“Fellow” as an adjective – sharing a particular activity, quality, or condition with someone or something.

Let the emphasis on the title of this article be on “fellow” and not on the “Americans” word. This use of fellow is in a direct and specific context to those who stand for a free, independent and sovereign America.

Read more “My Fellow Americans”

KKK 2.0

Contrary to incorrect perceptions of their photographs that I have slightly altered here, I wouldn’t dream of suggesting these model citizens of being White Supremacist; which is why I include the “2.0” reference.

The Next Generation

Klown #1 (From the Left)

33 year old Thomas Massey here was one of the 230 rioters arrested on Trump’s inauguration day fiasco, where; a newspaper report notes he said (About the riots/protests that day) – “I think there should have been more violence yesterday,” 

Klown #2

37 year old Joseph Alcoff, who goes by the names of “Chepe” and “Jose Martin”, and is a “leader” in a Washington, D.C. chapter of Antifa, called “Smash Racism DC” (Remember that name) – also stars in a video, spitting at the camera operator, and shouting “I’m a communist, mother%$#ker” – Smash Racism DC was also involved with Senator Ted Cruz being chased from a restaurant. As well as showing up at the home of Fox News host Tucker Carlson, in November.

Klown #3

33 year old Thomas Keenan, also a “leader” of an Antifa group out of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Our 3rd hero in this story was arrested in 2011; along with Klown #2, in Bordertown, New Jersey, for rioting.

Contrary to incorrect perceptions of their photographs that I have slightly altered here, I wouldn’t dream of suggesting these model citizens of being White Supremacist; which is why I include the “2.0” reference.

These 3 gentlemen were arrested (Alcoff separately from Klowns 1 and 2, which were arrested at the same time) in the City of “Brotherly love” (Philadelphia, PA) for being among a reported 10-12 Antifa members who violently attacked 2 out of uniform U.S. Marines: Alejandro Godinez and Luis Torres, who were in town for a Marine Ball.

As the confrontation occurred, the two Marines were asked if they were “Proud Boys” (far-right neo-fascist organization), they were then called Nazis and White Supremacists; and were even spit on and one of the Marines had his cell phone stolen. Alejandro Godinez hollered out “I’m Mexican”, and the Marines were then referred to as “wetbacks” and “spics”.

Alcoff leads a group called “Smash Racism”, falsely presents himself as being a Hispanic person, and gets arrested (partly) for calling two Hispanic Marines, this plethora of racial slurs.

This is pure Leftist irony my friends.

Liberals are supposed to be against racism, yet these 3 clowns get arrested (in part) for racist actions and slurs against two Hispanic U.S. Marines.

The “2.0” reference in my photo of these 3 winners, is because the ideology “supremacy” is the same, even if it finds different targets to vent its anger and frustrations out on.

Those on the Liberal Left are (often proudly admitted) Communists and Socialists; and while their protests and/or demonstrations have mostly been peaceful since the 60’s, today’s Liberals are openly violent and destructive; increasingly so since the rise of former U.S. President Barack Obama.

Klown #2 was charged with 17 counts (including numerous felonies), has a criminal record, and winds up getting bail of only $15,000 dollars – the two other Klowns are also out on minor bail amounts.

While this may be 2019, my wife still remembers having to study and learn about Communism, in public schools in the 50’s and 60’s, but today’s Liberals are a far-cry from their 50’s and 60’s predecessors.

While the greater majority of Leftist Liberals play fast and loose about being Communists and/or Socialists themselves, there are many who are too stupid to go along with the cover-story, and just come right out and say they are. This is a natural reoccurring theme, the more power a group believes they have.

Though these 3 should be languishing in prison for a couple decades each, I have no doubt they’ll be in the news again, for many years to come. As inept as our government and judicial systems are, these 3 will be further recruited for their “talents” at public disruption, violence and chaos.

© 2019 JW Bowers

Build the Wall?

Illegal immigration isn’t new by any standards, but its primary uses should bother us just as much.

For purposes of this article, this has nothing to do with anyone who uses the system as designed, to become legal immigrants.

Having never experienced a need to flee a country due to political persecution, many of our friends on the Left believe that means I have no right to speak on the topic. Neither has any living Congress Member, had to flee political persecution in a foreign country!

That kind of logic wouldn’t allow a rapist a jury of their peers, unless the jurors were all rapists or rape victims.

While being extremely cognizant of those fleeing towards America for a better life; I still say, do it legally. There are no less than 9 places throughout Mexico where prospective immigrants can apply for asylum to America.

While the average idiot Leftist supporter on the street is completely oblivious to this (not that it would matter at all in reality), those who are pulling the strings of the Leftist hordes, are well aware of it.

Why would thousands of people “walk” more than 2,000 miles to California, instead of “walking” a little over 1,200 to Brownsville, Texas?

Because that was the planned destination from the beginning. California is well known for its share of Sanctuary Cities; and what a tremendous media firestorm this “Caravan” has been.

You had American Corporations involved with providing these fine folks with food, water, transportation, clothing, cash, cell phones; and champagne wishes and caviar dream.

This was orchestrated to be all it has been, and more. International Billionaire Liberal George Soros is well-entrenched in this as well, but he is far from alone.

I’m all for the “Wall” in addition to the war-chest of other methods employed to curb illegal immigration.

I do not believe funding the “Wall” is a real issue; its total costs are dwarfed by the sheer drain these illegals (who aren’t here to work, assimilate, etc…) do place on the country, but I question the will of Congress, to actually do it.

Though any numbers offered would be disputed by countless parties, I’m going to show a simple scenario.

A report prepared by the Democratic staff of the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee (2017) estimated this wall would cost 70 billion to construct, with another 150 million per year to maintain.

According to “The Federation for American Immigration Reform” the estimated yearly costs of illegal immigrants is about 134 billion per year.

Also according to “The Federation for American Immigration Reform” millions of illegals work all over America; and those that do, who are not attempting to hide, pay 19+ billion per year in Local, State and Federal taxes.

This is how simple math escapes the minds of fools and idiots.

Total cost of illegal immigrants = 134 billion per year

Let’s credit their tax contributions towards this yearly cost.

New yearly cost of illegal immigrants = 134 – 19 = 115 billion

Can you do simple math? That’s how simple works from a purely economic standpoint.

Build Wall – 70 billion

1 Year later = Savings of 50+ billion, with the wall paid for; followed by a yearly savings of that 115 billion.

115 billion yearly surplus – 150 million per year maintenance = a No-Brainer.

Imagine the ways the Local/State and Federal Governments could mismanage such a “yearly” windfall.

Trying to even imagine the real numbers, is a fools errand, so examples will have to suffice.

Again, this Wall should not be seen by anyone, as something that will stop illegal immigration 100%; that’s merely an empty argument. At minimum, it would greatly curb it, and cost the tax-payers a lot less.

So our Local, State and Federal taxing agencies could save 115 billion dollars per year; with all the government waste that exists, why would they not want to pull this 115 billion in and continue to spend like drunken sailors?

It is simply because this constant influx of illegal immigration simply pays more, in numerous ways. Human, Sex, Guns and Drug Trafficking, being key.

My top reasons why Congress and our Government; and States, don’t actually want this wall?

Government Distractions – Keep the masses occupied while government continues robbing and molesting us for generations to come.

Cheap Labor – Need to keep that 19 billion coming in per year; and growing, so they’ll always have this crutch to lean on.

Media/Mass Programming – Every day, we’re all being told what to think, believe, feel, fear, honor, eat, buy, wear and drive, even about illegal immigration and this particular Caravan from Honduras.

Liberal Votes – This answers itself

Without a porous southern Border in America, the Democrat Party would be dead inside 1-2 generations: though again, their myriads of followers are oblivious for the most part, those running the show (Their Leaders/Movers/Shakers, etc)… absolutely know this, which is why they work so hard to keep illegal alien, sanctuary cities and border issues, constantly in the news and social media.

Allow me to restate this:

Build the Wall? Absolutely; and from Coast to Coast, but serious efforts are also needed, to prevent any/all American citizens, groups, corporations, etc. (Foreign or Domestic)…………………….from furthering this fiasco.

Criminal charges at minimum.

J.W. Bowers Jr.

Picture taken from https://canadafreepress.com/article/once-again-sing-the-chorus-build-the-wall-build-the-wall-build-the-wall

The “Fair Share” Myth:

So goes the average argument from a Liberal (Leftist) mindset:

“The (Extreme/Uber) wealthy, should not be allowed their “deductions” and “loopholes”, because that means they’re not paying their fair share” and this means government can’t provide enough subsidies for all (societal) socialist concerns.

Though the imagined/perceived arguments; and consequences and/or results of this are far too reaching for a single article on such subject, I’ll summarize with one: “If all such (Extreme/Uber) “wealthy” people paid their “fair share”, these (societal) socialist concerns (free education, healthcare, welfare, and other special interests) would benefit greater in comparison to their present status’

From this point, this innumerable plethora of “interests” are listed, labeled, identified, etc…and then the return to the endless progressive arguments, whose total end game/goal, is absolute Statism.

I couldn’t care less for the weasels who attempt to slither under the radar, for individual differences (Oh that’s not me, because ________________________________) because by such instant deflection, they prove they do not understand the end result (ignorance), or they’re simply (deceptive) lying to you.

To begin with: who decides this fair share amount/percentage, what all is it based on, who defines what fair means; and is it really fair to all concerned?

And with the simple insertion of such questioning, it has now successfully changed the focus of the conversation through the use of something I refer to as “D.E.A.D. arguments”, pointing to their distractive, evasive, avoidance and deflecting from the immediate topic.

Unless we’re discussing a flat rate/amount/percentage (already complex) and an outright revocation of the entire U.S. income tax code (replacement legislation needed), you’re still discussing a process that includes nearly 400 million Americans, who all should be considered in the process and application of such replacement system.

Every locale across the country is going to demand equal representation in such legislation considerations, with every city/county/state taxing board offering multitudes of ideas, proposals, suggestions, grievances, etc…

One of the reasons such difficult conversations are difficult with respect to those on the Liberal Left, is because basic facts, logic, math, science and deductive reasoning, are largely inadmissible in conversations with them about such topics; especially where it concerns contradiction or even correcting them.

Some facts and figures:

2017 U.S. GDP (Gross Domestic Product – Source www.thebalance.com) = $18 (trillion), 485 Billion.

2017 U.S. Government Revenue – Source www.thebalance.com) = $3.342 Trillion

$3,342 trillion / $18,485 Trillion = 18%

For 2017, “The federal deficit (SHORTFALL) in 2017 was $665 billion (Another 2/3rd trillion dollars – Source – www.cbo.gov) which would have required the taking of an additional 3.5 percent of gross domestic product, to balance out for the year.

So we’ll use a conservative figure of 21%, are you willing to agree to a flat rate of 21% of your own income being handed over to the Federal Government? Do you believe that if applied to all “Employed” individuals equally, the Federal Government would raise enough income to meet its yearly budgetary expenditures?

It wouldn’t come close.

Though America did first see yearly deficit amounts of more than 1 trillion (nearly 2 trillion in 2010) during the Obama “recovery” period, our yearly deficits will exceed this on a regular basis, in only a few short years’ time.

And our yearly deficits and debts, are simply going to continue to climb (No matter the political affiliation of the Presidents or Politicians in each administration), until they can be propped up no more.

The website taxfoundation.org notes “The share of income earned by the top 1 percent of taxpayers fell to 19.0 percent in 2013. Their share of federal income taxes fell slightly to 37.8 percent”

In some 2015 findings:

The top 1% income earners have nearly a 20% share of Adjusted Gross Income.

Out of 100% of a pie, the top 1% of 2015 American taxpayers paid nearly 38% of the total tax bill.

According to the IRS Statistics of Income, Individual and Tax Share for 2015:

A. The top 5% of income earners in America 2015 paid more than 56% of total income taxes collected for 2015.

To show a blinding contrast:

B. The bottom 50% of income earners in America 2015, paid less than 3% of total income taxes collected for the same year.

Mid-Statistic:

So the Liberal Leftists want the top income earners to pay “more” so the top income earner’s “fair share” is even higher than it is currently, thus reducing the weight on those of more “modest” means?

This is the virus demanding more of its host in a quicker time frame; eventually, killing its host, and itself.

The top 25% of income earners in America 2015, paid more than 86% of all income tax revenue

Let’s rejoin our hypothetical 21% universally applied income tax; comparing this taxation rate with our 2 (A and B) examples above, who’s taking home more money, and who’s going to get sucker punched?

Basic math here will also show you the Federal Government would have collected far less in revenue (oops, taxes) overall; including far less from the top income earners, but exponentially more from those in the lower income brackets. After doing this, you’re still increasing your yearly deficit, which gets tacked onto the National Debt, and this goes on year in and year out.

In comparison to these 2015 figures, you can see why the Federal Government could never agree to such an overall low Fair or Flat, income tax rate of 21%. They’d be even deeper in debt each year; and eventually, that system is going to collapse.

With 25% of the country already footing 86% of the income tax bill, how much more “fair” could this be possibly made, without reducing overall revenues? It can’t.

The Liberal Leftists need to shut up about any “fair share” because the only “fair share” they’re actually interested in, is somebody else’s fair share of the bill, while (under their own systems) their own majority would be paying in even less than they currently are doing.

Simple Economics elude the average Liberal Leftist: it’s not so much basic math that they do not understand, but it is in accepting the realization of what the numbers not only do say, but how that affects all their given “special interests” preferences.

The balancing of an income tax system is tricky enough, but always seeking to punish those who earn more, only causes the producers themselves (Investors, Manufacturers, Owners, Share-Holders and Management) to raise prices on their goods and services, so their profit margins aren’t negatively affected, but your purchase power takes another hit.

The “Fair Share” Myth, is simply a lie.