Uploaded 08/05/2018 1:20 AM Eastern
I recently learned of this individual.
Disagreements with methods or acts aside, I fully support the use of violence against Islam, because true Islam was born out of violence, and their Prophet has set them on a global conquest vision; and they fully intend to implement it.
The Anti-Violence, Leftist, Liberal voices of opposition, do not understand true Islam, nor are they taught it by their politicians, educational institutes, nor their media.
The world political official narrative for Islam, is presented through the majority being a “peaceful” people.
While absolutely true that the majority of Muslims do not engage in violence against non-Muslims, that same majority are the #1 enemy of what we’re told is “radical Islam”, or that “Even though they appear to be Muslims, they’re not real/true Muslims”
With a majority who do not engage in the violence of their “lone rangers”, why do we see no majority Islamic movement against jihad rape, enslavement, acid attacks, honor killings, etc…?
It is one thing within Islam to not engage in the jihad, but to actively speak against it, is the death penalty for such persons, and often, surrounding friends and family members.
Without doubt, the majority of Muslim attacks on other Muslims, is the majority of all Islamic attacks, worldwide. They do often wreak extreme newsworthiness, but the suicide bombs, train bombs and using vehicles as weapons, is only a tiny minority of the overall attacks and methods used.
Islam is to conquer everywhere their feet touch soil.
This peaceful majority, are not following their prophet’s orders/commands, so they are not well thought of by the “extremist” parts within Islam.
To speak against what the true Islamists do, is blasphemy against their prophet; which is the death penalty.
Peace through strength is what most pacifists resist and fight against, because of their dime-store fantasy novel ideas of a global utopia, which is impossible so long as Islam is allowed to exist, in addition to an innumerable number of other reasons why a global utopia, is a work of fiction, but presented, sold, bought and defended, as a hopeful reality.
I’ve known of the Islamic attacks against Buddhists, for several years; I find it especially peculiar that one man teaching others to fight back is what gets the mainstream news’s attention.
Wirathu is a Burmese Buddhist monk, and the communal leader of the anti-Muslim movement in Myanmar. He has been accused of conspiring to persecute Muslims in Myanmar through his speeches, although he claims to be a peaceful preacher and not to have advocated violence—which is disputed by others. Facebook also banned his page on the charge of spreading religious hatred towards other communities, after repeated warnings to not post religiously inflammatory content
I posted this on Facebook, with a prediction I’d be suspended for doing so.
Let’s see if I need add any updates later.
Owner/Operator @ wwwrafonreport.com
A Conservative U.S. Patriot Website
www.paltalk.com/RAFON1Copyright protected by Digiprove © 2018All Rights Reserved
|Original content here is published under these license terms:|| X |
|License Type:||Read Only|
|License Summary:||You may read the original content in the context in which it is published (at this web address). No other copying or use is permitted without written agreement from the author.|